diff --git a/event-binding.js b/event-binding.js
index 397912a..50e4edd 100644
--- a/event-binding.js
+++ b/event-binding.js
@@ -263,10 +263,45 @@ export function onMessageEditedController(runtime, messageId, meta = null) {
   runtime.refreshPersistedRecallMessageUi?.();
 }
 
-export function onMessageSwipedController(runtime, messageId, meta = null) {
+export async function onMessageSwipedController(runtime, messageId, meta = null) {
   runtime.invalidateRecallAfterHistoryMutation("已切换楼层 swipe");
-  runtime.scheduleHistoryMutationRecheck("message-swiped", messageId, meta);
+  const parsedFloor = Number(messageId);
+  const fromFloor = Number.isFinite(parsedFloor) ? parsedFloor : undefined;
+  let result = {
+    success: false,
+    rollbackPerformed: false,
+    extractionTriggered: false,
+    requestedFloor: fromFloor ?? null,
+    effectiveFromFloor: null,
+    recoveryPath: "reroll-handler-unavailable",
+    affectedBatchCount: 0,
+    error: "swipe reroll handler unavailable",
+  };
+
+  if (typeof runtime.onReroll === "function") {
+    try {
+      result = await runtime.onReroll({ fromFloor, meta });
+    } catch (error) {
+      runtime.console?.error?.("[ST-BME] swipe reroll failed:", error);
+      result = {
+        success: false,
+        rollbackPerformed: false,
+        extractionTriggered: false,
+        requestedFloor: fromFloor ?? null,
+        effectiveFromFloor: null,
+        recoveryPath: "reroll-threw",
+        affectedBatchCount: 0,
+        error: error?.message || String(error) || "swipe reroll failed",
+      };
+    }
+  } else {
+    runtime.console?.warn?.(
+      "[ST-BME] MESSAGE_SWIPED missing onReroll; skip generic history recovery fallback.",
+      { messageId, meta },
+    );
+  }
   runtime.refreshPersistedRecallMessageUi?.();
+  return result;
 }
 
 export async function onGenerationAfterCommandsController(
diff --git a/index.js b/index.js
index 34727f9..1077dce 100644
--- a/index.js
+++ b/index.js
@@ -7474,6 +7474,19 @@ async function rollbackGraphForReroll(targetFloor, context = getContext()) {
       resultCode: "reroll.rollback.applied",
     }),
   );
+  if (
+    Array.isArray(context?.chat) &&
+    Number.isFinite(currentGraph.historyState?.lastProcessedAssistantFloor) &&
+    currentGraph.historyState.lastProcessedAssistantFloor >= 0
+  ) {
+    // Preserve the rolled-back prefix immediately so a failed follow-up
+    // re-extraction does not look like a generic "missing processed hashes"
+    // corruption on the next history integrity check.
+    updateProcessedHistorySnapshot(
+      context.chat,
+      currentGraph.historyState.lastProcessedAssistantFloor,
+    );
+  }
   pruneProcessedMessageHashesFromFloor(currentGraph, effectiveFromFloor);
   currentGraph.lastProcessedSeq =
     currentGraph.historyState?.lastProcessedAssistantFloor ?? -1;
@@ -7623,6 +7636,16 @@ async function recoverHistoryIfNeeded(trigger = "history-recovery") {
           trigger,
       }),
     );
+    const recoveredLastProcessedFloor = Number.isFinite(
+      currentGraph?.historyState?.lastProcessedAssistantFloor,
+    )
+      ? currentGraph.historyState.lastProcessedAssistantFloor
+      : -1;
+    if (recoveredLastProcessedFloor >= 0) {
+      // Recovery replay has rebuilt the graph state; restore processed hashes so
+      // the next hash recheck does not immediately trigger another replay loop.
+      updateProcessedHistorySnapshot(chat, recoveredLastProcessedFloor);
+    }
     saveGraphToChat({ reason: "history-recovery-complete" });
     refreshPanelLiveState();
     updateStageNotice(
@@ -8180,10 +8203,11 @@ function onMessageEdited(messageId, meta = null) {
   return result;
 }
 
-function onMessageSwiped(messageId, meta = null) {
-  const result = onMessageSwipedController(
+async function onMessageSwiped(messageId, meta = null) {
+  const result = await onMessageSwipedController(
     {
       invalidateRecallAfterHistoryMutation,
+      onReroll,
       refreshPersistedRecallMessageUi: schedulePersistedRecallMessageUiRefresh,
       scheduleHistoryMutationRecheck,
     },
diff --git a/reroll-history-review-notes.md b/reroll-history-review-notes.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82ce6bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/reroll-history-review-notes.md
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+# ST-BME Reroll / History Recovery Review Notes
+
+## 1. Background and user pain points
+
+This note summarizes the issues found during a real debugging session, the user expectations behind the fixes, and the exact code changes that were made.
+
+Primary user pain points:
+
+- A new chat sometimes showed recall activity, but extraction state stayed at `processed floor = -1`, which made it look like nothing was recorded.
+- Manual extraction worked, but automatic behavior felt inconsistent.
+- The worst issue: after each new floor, ST-BME could enter history recovery, roll back, and replay extraction again, making every turn slow.
+- The user explicitly does not want reroll/swipe to degrade into rebuilding everything before the changed floor.
+
+The user's strongest expectations:
+
+- Normal extraction should stay incremental.
+- Hidden old floors do not need to be re-read just for extraction context.
+- If floor 16 is rerolled/swiped, only memories related to the affected suffix should be updated.
+- Floors before that prefix should not be replayed again.
+- `swipe/reroll` should not silently fall back to generic full history recovery.
+
+## 2. Important product/logic expectations from the user
+
+These were treated as design constraints during the fix:
+
+- Do not change the "hide old floors" strategy just to feed more extraction context.
+- Do not make reroll depend on re-reading all previous floors.
+- Do not allow reroll/swipe to degrade into full rebuild.
+- If targeted reroll rollback cannot be done safely, fail closed and report failure instead of rebuilding the whole prefix.
+
+## 3. What the code already intended to do
+
+The repo already had two different recovery concepts.
+
+### A. Generic history mutation recovery
+
+Used for broad history mutations such as edit, delete, or hash mismatch.
+
+Relevant code:
+
+- `inspectHistoryMutation(...)` in `index.js`
+- `recoverHistoryIfNeeded(...)` in `index.js`
+- `detectHistoryMutation(...)` in `runtime-state.js`
+
+This path can do larger recovery or replay work because it is trying to revalidate processed history integrity.
+
+### B. Dedicated reroll rollback
+
+Used for targeted suffix rollback around a reroll/swipe boundary.
+
+Relevant code:
+
+- `rollbackGraphForReroll(...)` in `index.js`
+- `onRerollController(...)` in `extraction-controller.js`
+
+This path is closer to the desired product behavior:
+
+- find a recovery point near the target floor
+- rollback only affected journals and suffix state
+- prune processed hashes from the affected floor onward
+- re-extract only the affected suffix
+
+## 4. Issue 1 that was fixed: recovery loop caused by lost processed hashes
+
+### Symptom
+
+The panel showed a pattern like:
+
+- history recovery starts
+- replay completes
+- next turn immediately triggers another recovery
+- reason mentions missing `processedMessageHashes`
+
+### Root cause
+
+After successful history recovery, dirty state was cleared, but processed message hashes were not restored. On the next integrity recheck, the system saw:
+
+- there is already processed progress
+- but `processedMessageHashes` is empty or missing
+
+That was interpreted as another dirty history condition, so recovery started again.
+
+### Fix
+
+After a successful recovery replay, restore processed hashes from current chat state before saving the graph.
+
+Relevant change:
+
+- `index.js`, `recoverHistoryIfNeeded(...)`
+- added call: `updateProcessedHistorySnapshot(chat, recoveredLastProcessedFloor)`
+
+Why this matters:
+
+- recovery replay now leaves history state internally consistent
+- the next hash recheck does not immediately trigger another replay loop
+
+### Regression test added
+
+- `tests/p0-regressions.mjs`
+- `testHistoryRecoverySuccessRestoresProcessedHashesAfterReplay()`
+
+## 5. Issue 2 that was fixed: host swipe event was routed into generic history recovery
+
+### Symptom
+
+Even though the repo already had dedicated reroll rollback code, the actual host `MESSAGE_SWIPED` event still went through generic history mutation recheck first.
+
+That meant a user swipe could enter the broader history recovery pipeline instead of the suffix-only reroll path.
+
+### Why this was wrong
+
+This conflicts with the desired behavior:
+
+- `swipe/reroll` is a targeted suffix change
+- it should not be treated like a generic broad history mutation
+- it should not have a path that silently escalates into full replay of earlier floors
+
+### Fix
+
+Changed event routing so that `MESSAGE_SWIPED` directly calls `onReroll(...)` instead of scheduling generic history mutation recheck.
+
+Relevant changes:
+
+- `event-binding.js`
+  - `onMessageSwipedController(...)` is now async
+  - it calls `runtime.onReroll({ fromFloor, meta })`
+  - it no longer schedules `scheduleHistoryMutationRecheck("message-swiped", ...)`
+- `index.js`
+  - `onMessageSwiped(...)` is now async
+  - runtime wiring now passes `onReroll`
+
+### Resulting behavior
+
+For swipe/reroll:
+
+- route to dedicated suffix rollback
+- if rollback succeeds, only affected suffix is re-extracted
+- if rollback cannot be done safely, fail as reroll rollback failure
+- do not silently drop into generic history recovery fallback
+
+### Regression test added
+
+- `tests/p0-regressions.mjs`
+- `testSwipeRoutesToRerollWithoutHistoryRecoveryFallback()`
+
+This test specifically asserts:
+
+- `onReroll` is called
+- `scheduleHistoryMutationRecheck` is not called
+
+## 6. Things intentionally not changed
+
+These were discussed and intentionally left alone:
+
+- The "hide old floors" behavior was not redesigned.
+- No attempt was made to force extraction to re-read very old floors.
+- No attempt was made to make reroll reconstruct the entire prior conversation.
+
+This matches the user's explicit preference:
+
+- previous floors should already be recorded
+- reroll should only repair the affected suffix
+- old hidden floors should not become the reason for broader replay behavior
+
+## 7. Current intended invariants after the fixes
+
+These are the important invariants another reviewer should validate:
+
+1. Normal extraction remains incremental.
+2. Generic edit/delete/hash corruption can still use broader recovery if needed.
+3. `swipe/reroll` must use dedicated suffix rollback logic.
+4. `swipe/reroll` must not silently degrade into generic full history recovery.
+5. Successful recovery replay must leave `processedMessageHashes` populated consistently with processed floor state.
+
+## 8. Files directly involved
+
+- `index.js`
+- `event-binding.js`
+- `extraction-controller.js`
+- `runtime-state.js`
+- `chat-history.js`
+- `tests/p0-regressions.mjs`
+
+## 9. Concrete code locations worth reviewing
+
+Suggested review targets:
+
+- `index.js`
+  - `recoverHistoryIfNeeded(...)`
+  - `rollbackGraphForReroll(...)`
+  - `onMessageSwiped(...)`
+- `event-binding.js`
+  - `onMessageSwipedController(...)`
+- `extraction-controller.js`
+  - `onRerollController(...)`
+- `runtime-state.js`
+  - `detectHistoryMutation(...)`
+  - `clearHistoryDirty(...)`
+- `chat-history.js`
+  - processed hash pruning and extraction window helpers
+
+## 10. What was verified locally
+
+Executed successfully:
+
+- `node --check event-binding.js`
+- `node --check index.js`
+- `node --check tests/p0-regressions.mjs`
+- `node tests/p0-regressions.mjs`
+
+## 11. What I want the reviewing AI to focus on
+
+Please review for these questions:
+
+- Is there any remaining code path where `MESSAGE_SWIPED` can still end up in `recoverHistoryIfNeeded(...)` instead of dedicated reroll rollback?
+- Is there any remaining reroll path that can still escalate into prefix/full rebuild instead of suffix-only repair?
+- After reroll rollback, are `historyState`, `processedMessageHashes`, and vector repair state all kept mutually consistent?
+- Are there any race conditions between swipe-triggered reroll, auto extraction, and delayed hide application?
+- Does the current failure mode truly fail closed, or is there still an implicit generic fallback somewhere else?
+
+## 12. Short conclusion
+
+The key product decision behind these fixes is:
+
+- generic history corruption and targeted reroll are not the same thing
+- reroll/swipe should be handled as suffix repair, not broad recovery
+
+The current changes aim to enforce exactly that distinction.
diff --git a/tests/p0-regressions.mjs b/tests/p0-regressions.mjs
index 8df323a..b713efb 100644
--- a/tests/p0-regressions.mjs
+++ b/tests/p0-regressions.mjs
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import {
   onChatChangedController,
   onGenerationAfterCommandsController,
   onGenerationStartedController,
+  onMessageSwipedController,
   registerCoreEventHooksController,
 } from "../event-binding.js";
 import {
@@ -204,10 +205,13 @@ function createBatchStageHarness() {
     const marker = "function notifyHistoryDirty(dirtyFrom, reason) {";
     const start = source.indexOf("function shouldAdvanceProcessedHistory(");
     const end = source.indexOf(marker);
-    if (start < 0 || end < 0 || end <= start) {
+    const resolvedEnd = end >= 0 ? end : endFallback;
+    if (start < 0 || resolvedEnd < 0 || resolvedEnd <= start) {
       throw new Error("无法从 index.js 提取批次状态机定义");
     }
-    const snippet = source.slice(start, end).replace(/^export\s+/gm, "");
+    const snippet = source
+      .slice(start, resolvedEnd)
+      .replace(/^export\s+/gm, "");
     const context = {
       console,
       result: null,
@@ -256,10 +260,13 @@ function createGenerationRecallHarness(options = {}) {
     const end = source.indexOf(
       'function onMessageReceived(messageId = null, type = "") {',
     );
-    if (start < 0 || end < 0 || end <= start) {
+    const resolvedEnd = end >= 0 ? end : endFallback;
+    if (start < 0 || resolvedEnd < 0 || resolvedEnd <= start) {
       throw new Error("无法从 index.js 提取生成召回事务定义");
     }
-    const snippet = source.slice(start, end).replace(/^export\s+/gm, "");
+    const snippet = source
+      .slice(start, resolvedEnd)
+      .replace(/^export\s+/gm, "");
     const context = {
       console,
       Date,
@@ -484,11 +491,15 @@ function createGenerationRecallHarness(options = {}) {
 function createHistoryRecoveryHarness() {
   return fs.readFile(indexPath, "utf8").then((source) => {
     const start = source.indexOf("async function recoverHistoryIfNeeded(");
+    const endFallback = source.indexOf("async function runExtraction()");
     const end = source.indexOf("/**\n * 提取管线：处理未提取的对话楼层");
-    if (start < 0 || end < 0 || end <= start) {
+    const resolvedEnd = end >= 0 ? end : endFallback;
+    if (start < 0 || resolvedEnd < 0 || resolvedEnd <= start) {
       throw new Error("无法从 index.js 提取 history recovery 定义");
     }
-    const snippet = source.slice(start, end).replace(/^export\s+/gm, "");
+    const snippet = source
+      .slice(start, resolvedEnd)
+      .replace(/^export\s+/gm, "");
     const context = {
       console,
       Date,
@@ -623,6 +634,19 @@ function createHistoryRecoveryHarness() {
         }
         return 0;
       },
+      updateProcessedHistorySnapshot(chat, lastProcessedAssistantFloor) {
+        context.updatedProcessedHistorySnapshot = {
+          chatLength: Array.isArray(chat) ? chat.length : 0,
+          lastProcessedAssistantFloor,
+        };
+        context.currentGraph.historyState ||= {};
+        context.currentGraph.historyState.lastProcessedAssistantFloor =
+          lastProcessedAssistantFloor;
+        context.currentGraph.historyState.processedMessageHashes =
+          lastProcessedAssistantFloor >= 0
+            ? { [lastProcessedAssistantFloor]: `hash-${lastProcessedAssistantFloor}` }
+            : {};
+      },
       clearHistoryDirty(graph, result) {
         context.clearedHistoryDirty = result;
         graph.historyState ||= {};
@@ -769,6 +793,20 @@ function createRerollHarness() {
       async deleteBackendVectorHashesForRecovery(...args) {
         context.deletedHashesCalls.push(args);
       },
+      updateProcessedHistorySnapshot(chat, lastProcessedAssistantFloor) {
+        context.updatedProcessedHistorySnapshot = {
+          chatLength: Array.isArray(chat) ? chat.length : 0,
+          lastProcessedAssistantFloor,
+        };
+        context.currentGraph.historyState ||= {};
+        context.currentGraph.historyState.lastProcessedAssistantFloor =
+          lastProcessedAssistantFloor;
+        context.currentGraph.historyState.processedMessageHashes =
+          lastProcessedAssistantFloor >= 0
+            ? { [lastProcessedAssistantFloor]: `hash-${lastProcessedAssistantFloor}` }
+            : {};
+        context.currentGraph.lastProcessedSeq = lastProcessedAssistantFloor;
+      },
       pruneProcessedMessageHashesFromFloor(graph, fromFloor) {
         return pruneProcessedMessageHashesFromFloor(graph, fromFloor);
       },
@@ -2861,6 +2899,53 @@ async function testChatChangedDoesNotClearCoreEventBindings() {
   assert.equal(clearPendingAutoExtractionCalls, 1);
 }
 
+async function testSwipeRoutesToRerollWithoutHistoryRecoveryFallback() {
+  const invalidationReasons = [];
+  const rerollCalls = [];
+  let historyRecheckCalls = 0;
+  let refreshCalls = 0;
+
+  const result = await onMessageSwipedController(
+    {
+      invalidateRecallAfterHistoryMutation(reason) {
+        invalidationReasons.push(reason);
+      },
+      async onReroll(payload) {
+        rerollCalls.push(payload);
+        return {
+          success: true,
+          rollbackPerformed: true,
+          extractionTriggered: true,
+          requestedFloor: payload.fromFloor,
+          effectiveFromFloor: payload.fromFloor,
+          recoveryPath: "reverse-journal",
+          affectedBatchCount: 1,
+          error: "",
+        };
+      },
+      scheduleHistoryMutationRecheck() {
+        historyRecheckCalls += 1;
+      },
+      refreshPersistedRecallMessageUi() {
+        refreshCalls += 1;
+      },
+      console: {
+        warn() {},
+        error() {},
+      },
+    },
+    16,
+    { reason: "host-swipe" },
+  );
+
+  assert.equal(invalidationReasons.length, 1);
+  assert.deepEqual(rerollCalls, [{ fromFloor: 16, meta: { reason: "host-swipe" } }]);
+  assert.equal(historyRecheckCalls, 0);
+  assert.equal(refreshCalls, 1);
+  assert.equal(result.success, true);
+  assert.equal(result.recoveryPath, "reverse-journal");
+}
+
 async function testAutoExtractionDefersWhenGraphNotReady() {
   const deferredReasons = [];
   const statuses = [];
@@ -3661,6 +3746,57 @@ async function testHistoryRecoveryFallbackFullRebuildCarriesResultCode() {
   );
 }
 
+async function testHistoryRecoverySuccessRestoresProcessedHashesAfterReplay() {
+  const harness = await createHistoryRecoveryHarness();
+  harness.chat = [
+    { is_user: true, mes: "u1" },
+    { is_user: false, mes: "a1" },
+  ];
+  harness.currentGraph = {
+    historyState: {
+      lastProcessedAssistantFloor: 1,
+      processedMessageHashes: { 1: "old-hash-1" },
+      historyDirtyFrom: 1,
+      lastMutationSource: "message-edited",
+    },
+    vectorIndexState: {
+      collectionId: "col-1",
+      dirty: false,
+      dirtyReason: "",
+      pendingRepairFromFloor: null,
+      replayRequiredNodeIds: [],
+      lastWarning: "",
+      lastIntegrityIssue: null,
+    },
+    batchJournal: [],
+    lastProcessedSeq: 1,
+  };
+  harness.findJournalRecoveryPointImpl = () => ({
+    path: "full-rebuild",
+    affectedBatchCount: 0,
+  });
+  harness.replayExtractionFromHistoryImpl = async () => {
+    harness.currentGraph.historyState.lastProcessedAssistantFloor = 1;
+    harness.currentGraph.lastProcessedSeq = 1;
+    return 1;
+  };
+
+  const result = await harness.result.recoverFromHistoryMutation({
+    trigger: "message-edited",
+    dirtyFrom: 1,
+    detection: { source: "manual-test", reason: "edited" },
+  });
+
+  assert.equal(result, true);
+  assert.deepEqual(harness.updatedProcessedHistorySnapshot, {
+    chatLength: 2,
+    lastProcessedAssistantFloor: 1,
+  });
+  assert.deepEqual(harness.currentGraph.historyState.processedMessageHashes, {
+    1: "hash-1",
+  });
+}
+
 async function testHistoryRecoveryFailureCarriesResultCode() {
   const harness = await createHistoryRecoveryHarness();
   harness.chat = [
@@ -3782,6 +3918,72 @@ async function testRerollFallsBackToDirectExtractForUnprocessedFloor() {
   assert.equal(harness.saveGraphToChatCalls, 0);
 }
 
+async function testRerollPreservesPrefixHashesWhenReextractDoesNotAdvance() {
+  const harness = await createRerollHarness();
+  harness.chat = [
+    { is_user: true, mes: "u1" },
+    { is_user: false, mes: "a1" },
+    { is_user: true, mes: "u2" },
+    { is_user: false, mes: "a2" },
+    { is_user: true, mes: "u3" },
+    { is_user: false, mes: "a3" },
+  ];
+  harness.currentGraph = {
+    historyState: {
+      lastProcessedAssistantFloor: 5,
+      processedMessageHashes: {
+        1: "hash-1",
+        3: "hash-3",
+        5: "hash-5",
+      },
+    },
+    vectorIndexState: {
+      collectionId: "col-1",
+    },
+    batchJournal: [{ id: "journal-1" }],
+    lastProcessedSeq: 5,
+  };
+  harness.postRollbackGraph = {
+    historyState: {
+      lastProcessedAssistantFloor: 1,
+      processedMessageHashes: {
+        1: "old-hash-1",
+        3: "stale-hash",
+      },
+    },
+    vectorIndexState: {
+      collectionId: "col-1",
+    },
+    batchJournal: [],
+    lastProcessedSeq: 1,
+  };
+  harness.findJournalRecoveryPointImpl = () => ({
+    path: "reverse-journal",
+    affectedBatchCount: 1,
+    affectedJournals: [{ id: "journal-1" }],
+  });
+  harness.buildReverseJournalRecoveryPlanImpl = () => ({
+    backendDeleteHashes: [],
+    replayRequiredNodeIds: [],
+    pendingRepairFromFloor: 2,
+    legacyGapFallback: false,
+    dirtyReason: "history-recovery-replay",
+  });
+  harness.manualExtractLevel = "error";
+
+  const result = await harness.result.onReroll({ fromFloor: 3 });
+
+  assert.equal(result.success, true);
+  assert.equal(result.extractionStatus, "error");
+  assert.deepEqual(harness.updatedProcessedHistorySnapshot, {
+    chatLength: 6,
+    lastProcessedAssistantFloor: 1,
+  });
+  assert.deepEqual(harness.currentGraph.historyState.processedMessageHashes, {
+    1: "hash-1",
+  });
+}
+
 async function testLlmDebugSnapshotRedactsSecretsBeforeStorage() {
   const originalFetch = globalThis.fetch;
   const previousSettings = JSON.parse(
@@ -4015,6 +4217,7 @@ await testGenerationRecallSkippedStateDoesNotLoopToBeforeCombine();
 await testGenerationRecallSentMessageClearsStaleTransactionForSameKey();
 await testRegisterCoreEventHooksIsIdempotent();
 await testChatChangedDoesNotClearCoreEventBindings();
+await testSwipeRoutesToRerollWithoutHistoryRecoveryFallback();
 await testAutoExtractionDefersWhenGraphNotReady();
 await testAutoExtractionDefersWhenAlreadyExtracting();
 await testAutoExtractionDefersWhenHistoryRecoveryBusy();
@@ -4034,9 +4237,11 @@ await testRecallSubGraphAndDataLayerEntryPoints();
 await testRerollUsesBatchBoundaryRollbackAndPersistsState();
 await testHistoryRecoveryAbortClearsVectorRepairState();
 await testHistoryRecoveryFallbackFullRebuildCarriesResultCode();
+await testHistoryRecoverySuccessRestoresProcessedHashesAfterReplay();
 await testHistoryRecoveryFailureCarriesResultCode();
 await testRerollRejectsMissingRecoveryPoint();
 await testRerollFallsBackToDirectExtractForUnprocessedFloor();
+await testRerollPreservesPrefixHashesWhenReextractDoesNotAdvance();
 await testLlmDebugSnapshotRedactsSecretsBeforeStorage();
 await testEmbeddingUsesConfigTimeoutInsteadOfDefault();
 await testLlmOutputRegexCleansResponseBeforeJsonParse();